![]() ![]() I think the no-cost service is excellent and I’m going to start running all my writing through it. Let me just say they were in a similar vein to the ones I’ve just listed. I won’t bore you by listing the other errors. Some word repetition, used deliberately, can help “pull” readers through articles. I know your grade 10 social studies teacher told you that you always needed to prepare an outline. I should probably have said, “I have to re-do work that I did once before.”ĭo a mindmap rather than an outline. I’m having to re-do work that I did once before. Guilty! I have a bad way of being unclear with antecedents. I think Grammarly was right that my “this” wasn’t transparent. So here is the information the extra $29.95 bought me: (Also, while you must give them your credit card number upfront, you’re entitled to a refund for up to a week.) Although it pained me to spend $29.95 for checking a single article, in the interest of investigative journalism, I decided I had to do it. #Grammarly price upgradeMore alarmingly, the service told me I had 30 “advanced issues,” and I needed to pay for an upgrade to find out what they were. In any case, I appreciated the little explanatory notes Grammarly provided with each “error.” I also liked the way I was able to ignore their advice when I deemed it wrong or unnecessary. Nice try, Grammarly, but you’re wrong about that. ![]() Some people are born tall others are born short. Grammarly told me that I shouldn’t have used a comma after wrongheaded. This is almost always wrongheaded, and is a terrific way to convince yourself that you have a case of writer’s block. I didn’t agree with some of them as I eschew the Oxford comma (unless I need it for clarity) but it caught a few items I had missed. I just ran my blog post from last week through it, and it identified 12 of what it termed “critical issues” in the post. #Grammarly price softwareIt captures a bevy of errors that Bill Gates’ software ignores. #Grammarly price freeThe free version of Grammarly is much more sophisticated than Word. (I just did a test, and Word captured the difference between their and they’re so its artificial intelligence has improved in the last five years, at least.) But it won’t always identify homonyms - words that sound the same but that carry different meanings: road vs. It will catch some of the more egregious errors you might make. So, what’s the difference between the free version and the premium one? And how does it compare to the spell checker everyone gets with MS Word? Here’s my take on spelling and grammar checkers: But - here’s my important warning - don’t sign up for a year-long program unless you’re certain it’s going to pay off for you. Of course, you can save some money if you’re willing to pay quarterly ($19.98/month or $239.76 per year) or annually ($11.66/month or $139.92 per year). That relatively small monthly fee works out to $359.40 per year, which isn’t exactly small potatoes. That cost sounds small, but like cell phone and cable bills, it adds up quickly. But if you want the more robust version you need to pay $29.95/month. ![]() One of my clients has a subscription to the grammar-checker service Grammarly. The basic function offered by Grammarly - identifying most spelling and grammar errors - is no charge. Is it worth spending the money for the more expensive option? Grammarly is a free app with a paid-for premium option. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |